Showing posts sorted by relevance for query ayn. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query ayn. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, May 13, 2011

GOP @)!@ ...(2012)

2012 that is.
Mitch Daniels, was my earliest hunch, Huntsman was a close second. Ron Paul was an early hope, but Gary Johnson beat him to the announcement. Now when I say hope, this is from the perspective that there be a good candidate for Republicans and the 2012 race, not that they should have any shot at being good for the country. This does not take into considerations any impact of a third party or independent candidate, or any political calculus. I don't find any references in a search of my blog but could have embedded some comment or link that may mention them. I associate Daniels with a Chris Matthews* comment, and Huntsman with some China controversy, while Paul and Johnson are libertarian. Which may be why I have been focused on economics and Ayn Rand. I would like to have a good de bait on neo-classical economics. It is hard to imagine Mitt Romney making it but then the longer the so-called libertarian or tea party candidate split the vote he or these guys could run the fish ladder, and it is hard to imagine a third party candidate that would not be just another spoiler. I don't want to do the political calculus to rock that boat.

* one reason I might scratch Daniels, but then again

5-17-11 Related links: Needless to say** Label
(Republicans 2012)

One No Trump
Two No Huckabee***

**Calm Pend E Um has a reference to an anomoly
*** Raising Cain

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Slash Segue

Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate
And Criss-Classification
It is not about right or left but who* is the behind.

*please excuse the just(juxt)aposition of humor

---

For Sagans Sake: I will ungoogle the B. or link con tent:
(i.e. list of links above)
TED: Sandel as noted
Sandel/Soros
BookTV: Hedges on Class
New Yorker: Taleb
Jim Wallis(Sojourners) Sandel
BBC:Sit com? (no pun but Latin roots**)
Taleb Context
*
Asimov context
Mike Wallace: Ayn Rand
Embed(un) Pop Culture
Pre-Decartes or Aristotellian***?

**actual roots are(not) the spin on "darkest before the storm"

*** not to mention the B&A tangents not relinkeds(sp!)
[2-17-11 UPDATE:(not) Talk about a fifth sense? Yikes.]

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Fair and Balanced News?

The Daily Show Jon Stewart: 'Wisconsin Union Protest Is The Bizarro Tea Party' (VIDEO) *

Debt is a red herring.
Fair & balanced?
Hook, Line and Sinker?
Here is the bait:
Belly Up to the Bill Boys or Girls.

Not so sure about fake doctor's excuses though. The irony is in the getting between the patient and their health care, not to mention a perspective on government licences.(some work in draft may connect later)

* a bit Ayn Randian to note the dates
(And "bait" refers to some heavy links]

Wednesday, January 04, 2012

I Ron Knee Chef

Ctrl F Kitchen

Obama Takes it to the Kitchen.
OK, Lawrence O'Donnell is not there yet.[*]
True Man Label: Bring it On.

* 1-5-11 Lawrence O'Donnell: McCain Courage, Mormon Cult(ure) and perfect family. (Mitt Romney)
Recess appointment is perfect politics.  Make our** day. (not to get Harry) i.e. take it to court or the people
Is Obama the 75% man?  Mitt may be politically perfect, or the least of how many evils?
Trump wanted some enthusiasm, but who am I to be enthused by the choice of an even weaker candidate to face Obama?  I hope the Republicans give us their best.  It is a process that just might do that.  Unfortunately their best for some Republicans, Libertarians, and farther wrongs would be worse for the country. A flip-flopping un-nuanced Romney is their best shot.  Someone more extreme*** would be better for the race and the country by allowing Obama to carry the middle left.

** dirty Truman and his spatula
[Later The Daily Caller and Neo-Nuanced R's. ]
*** link added (**also & Neo)
[Neo-Bush, Frank/Dodd and Obamanomics.]
[Rachel Maddow, Star Chamber]
[Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes, Thom Hartmann, Lawrence O'Donnell]

1-6-11 Paul Harvey, The Rest of the Story. "not really".
Jobs-check, Cuts-check, debt next, but that means revenue also. As for certainty?
Note: use of punctuation, (sic)/pun, "air quotes" or lack of... c-BTW/irony.
(Ctrl F: "best" link inserted above)
[Rachel Maddow follow up or vise verse us ? Steele and Obama!]
[Santorum: Civil ad cert'em, a lesson in logic and taking the 9th.]
[Lawrence O'Donnell follow-up and tetra heed run ! (c-1-5 "courage":It was noted that it would be a lack of courage for McCain not to endorse a Republican candidate at this late date.  So he endorses after the first delegates have been selected?  Typical fear of fear monger.)]
BTW:  China Or Germany? Which Economy Stupid? This proves you can learn from others, but it doesn't say what.

Awkward Breaking(BTW/Less Embedded)News(Ein, Ein, Ayn?)
i.e. next post/segue!
Speaking of Newt Eyed Peas, what he said to the NAACP.
Just demand jobs instead of food stamps?  Not to be snarky.

< previous post >

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Use Dispersants On BP!

Not the chemical kind, the market kind.

The Answer to BP is Dispersants

Chapter 11 or Receivership? NO! Let the market work. As their stock goes down, someone will by it. Let them be taken over, but don't let them escape their responsibility. This idea started as a joke, what is the solution? Dispersants. Use them on BP, on the executives as well, might not be bad. As they are dispersed hold their new affiliations accountable.

Do you know who else started as a joke? Ayn Rand, at least as a fiction. But her ideas were soon dispersed, from Objectivism, to Libertarianism, Reaganomics. She was anti-collectivism, so she would rolling in her grave over the corporate personhood, but it is hard to tell, given how her ideas were dispersed, and never dispersed the foundational errors of government expansion. Or she could be just a misunderstood tea partier. But back to our problem, the BIG PROBLEM OF BIG PROFITS AND BIG POLLUTION. Too big to fail? Too big to bail... out that is.

If Obama does not quite meet the level of FDR, I might just say...GO BUSH! That is right GO BUSH ON US,GO BUSH ON BP, GO BUSH on the Bush Problems.**

Of course I am being facitious in part. But if he would at least GO TRUMAN on us, or even Milton Friedman. Few probably know (if wiki is right*) that Milton Friedman, proposed a negative income tax. And he was a Reagan economic advisor. Take what you will from this, but it better be a lesson that the government is not the problem, but it is part of it, and so are corporations.

* others call it left
** how about those quaint laws like commerce: Article One of the constitution, and congress

[Big Patriot Act: if I may disperse or chemically adjust a Thom Hartmann/ Ellen Ratner exchange. (Can we see their papers?)]

[Sub-section II,(Heck I dunno what #/article or Hyperlink), but BP should evolve from Bad Practices to Better Purposes, not Beck-headed Prophets. BTW: the BP on this my(Bulk Perspective) is the comment in the first link at OpEdNews.]

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Facebook Town Hall (amended)

[originally tacked on to previous post]
[SEGUE: amendment written after a District Democratic meeting and get together(see footnote.)]

[...I note here an additional gripe from Sam Stein (for continuity sake, Sam Stein is writing about the Fiscal Speech not the Facebook Town Hall]:
Several members of Congress also expressed agitation with the timing. Obama’s speech came after Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) unveiled his own budget plan, giving his own remarks the veneer of a presidential response rather than executive leadership.

Well, excuuuuuse me! But the President came out with his 2012 Budget proposal almost two months before the Ryan budget. But one hanging chad here is that the context of the debt is not just about the good economic times under lower taxes(which is shakey) but that there was excessive borrowing and spending that helped the economy. It was not so much tax and spend Liberals, but war and borrow and spend and bailout Conservatives. Which merits a further comparison from the Facebook Town Hall (transcript) :(President Obama)
Because this recession came at a time when we were already deeply in debt and it made the debt worse, if we don’t have a serious plan to tackle the debt and the deficit, that could actually end up being a bigger drag on the economy than anything else. If the markets start feeling that we’re not serious about the problem, and if you start seeing investors feel uncertain about the future, then they could pull back right at the time when the economy is taking off.

So you’re right that it’s tricky. Folks around here are used to the hills in San Francisco, and you’ve driven -- I don’t know if they still have clutch cars around here. Anybody every driven a clutch car? (Laughter.) I mean, you got to sort of tap and -- well, that’s sort of what we faced in terms of the economy, right? We got to hit the accelerator, but we’ve got to also make sure that we don’t gun it; we can’t let the car slip backwards. And so what we’re trying to do then is put together a debt and deficit plan that doesn’t slash spending so drastically that we can’t still make investments in education, that we can’t still make investments in infrastructure -- all of which would help the economy grow.
Then there is Speaker Boehner:
Boehner, R-Ohio, said the biggest accomplishment of the Republican House this year has been to change the debate on spending -- and the budget compromise sets the stage for even bigger cuts. "It's like driving down the highway and throwing your car into reverse," Boehner said.
Which should complete the "who is in the driver's seat" metaphor.

[Footnote: In late night discussions, I brought up George Lakoff and in response, Systems Thinking was mentioned, and here is an article, which I may have already ran across in other form(Under Supported*). And yes it is similar to my Tetrahedron of Will, not that having dimentions alone denotes similarity.

[Speaking of parallels or tangents, I just missed a bit on Thom Hartmann reviewing Atlas Shrugged**.

* And apologies to my education and not yet having not fully reading the link, but I did study Systems Theory in Organizational Behavior.

** Ayn Rand

Friday, April 22, 2011

Happy Earth Day!

It's not too late.

A Faith-Based Wake-Up Call on Earth Day

by Bishop Robinson for Center for American Progress

Speaking of E. D.
[Environmental Disinformation, and Reptile Disfunction]

[Speaking of leaps... searching... this is it... from here. I have a project in the works* regarding Atlas Shrugged author Ayn Rand, but just as I finished the previous post, former Governor Gary Johnson N.M. enters the 2012 race.(Not to mention quixotic mixes.)]
[More Dylan Ratigan: Pre-Town Hall, The Koch Party, Gulf Disaster, Debt Ceiling, Bright Bart, De Deficit.]
[De Calf Party]

* A Novelist Idea: here is a post draft trailer or tease.(apparently not that novelist)

Thursday, January 16, 2014

From Bingo to...

Tic-Tack-TOW[!]*


Kind of like: As I Mov(e) over Ayn^!

^ pronounced -ein as in Frankenstein. 
(or could be -ane as in-ane or un-frank'nane[?])

*[C] Labels
(FP #!)
[italics and 4 links added]
[or course ? !]

[...]
From Godwin to Dogwink? or wiping the bridge/floor to a stalemate?   


 
Geometry

Maslow / Finkelstein
^ <...> ^ 

Monday, January 18, 2010

These two could have something(in A chord)

(This material is now being posted on 1-20-2010 from a 1-18-10 email to a spot held in Save Now & bracketed by Remembering(s))
These two
Steve Clemons
David Sirota
could have something(in A chord)
:
at least it is not this,
Ayn Rand
Who knows? Oh, Brown?;
or this,
Mythification
George F. Will.

Oh No! Uh?
We sink?
Not again?
Non Sense
Move On
Warning for above:
do not get stuck on the ladder two.


Harmony?
Three Dog Night
Tenatious D *
No Whit Holmes! ***
Sixth Chord?

* search for yourself find holmes in lyrics

and ** sixth chord

WTShhhhh...
What(or where) the ** is the missing asterisk(no ribble?)

(The incongruous nature of this ** is due to minimal adaptations from email 4mat to blog, and the ribble for open ended reconstruction.)

Note: any future alterations will be [bracketed] and there is a bit of a ribble of error(and asterisks) in the last stanza after the ladder[sic] crack.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Post Romaticus

The Shelley Game ?

Pax Roman tic us?

Ayn Rand had a brilliant intellect.  Possibly on the scale of Wittgenstein or maybe Mary Shelley or one* of her creations.

[*-2] : A. , B. Two Birds , C. Hard to Believe ,  D. "if I were dictator" , [eh?] FOX ROMANTIC U.S.
[-5].,  R.I.P. [ow]

Reference italics mbedded images. VOX bruticus?

Friday, April 27, 2012

Tetra Heed Ron

of I Ron Knee[!]





Mitt: The Real European
Now apparently it’s a “slam” to say Paul Ryan likes Ayn Rand***
Self-awareness, Republican-style
Minimum-wage misconceptions


Mitt-Flop* of Golden Rule and the bottom-line**.


* could have sworn I heard it on Norman Goldman
** I think we should play up the Joint JD/MBA card, vs. the community/constitutional prof.
[I mean what business practices would benefit government?  Profits or Bankruptcy?  It's not six of one half dozen of the other.  However, a card from the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, may be telling.  But this is a far cry from the Krugman/Bernstein crack at the Mitt-Flop.]



Wednesday, September 05, 2012

Four More Years!

[ Wednesday 9-5-12 Original Post 1:27 PM]
 
 
 
Bill Maher is to Rush Limbaugh
as Isaac Asimov is to Ayn Rand.** 
(you do the vous due)*** 
 
* C-charts
*** Bill Clinton (or the three R's)
[RawMoney, Lyin', Writhmatic.]
[Republican concedes.]^^
 
Note: Update anomoly or algorythm?
 
(Jansing&Co and The Place for Politics^)
(Not finished with links)
(Original labels: cartoons, charts, DNC Convention, Obamanomics)  

^ Fluke Flays Romney
^^ Bill o'check? (inconvenient aster^^^risked)
^^^ You know you are a Tea Partier if...you expect a berg'R King,

Wednesday, April 27, 2011